How LA Unified screwed it up.

Holy Hell.

I’m not sure- even in my wildest dreams- that I could have dreamed up much more off a mess than LA Unified has created with it’s botched 1:1 iPad program. In case you haven’t heard, let me share what’s currently going on:

LAU purchased 700,000 iPads (at a cost of roughly $1,000,000,000). Thus far, about 700 of those had made their way into the hands of the students. And today, news has come that students have “hacked” their iPads to remove the school-imposed restrictions. As a result of this “hacking” school officials have halted the entire iPad initiative. Stopped it entirely. There are a lot of problems with this story. I’m going to enumerate them:

  1. The restrictions were delete-able
  2. Calling this “hacking” is a wild and grossly inaccurate statement
  3. Stopping the entire project effectively kills the project

In addition, they appear to have provided no training to teachers about how to use these devices in schools. Students and teachers were simply given iPads and expected to make it work.

No support = failure.

What angers me more than LAU potentially squandering a billion dollars is what this failure will do to the perception of 1:1 programs everywhere else. Their lack of planing and poor deployment endangers the future funding of all 1:1 programs. The public now thinks, erroneously, that iPads can be casually “hacked.” That they won’t get used. That teachers hate them.

And all of this could have been avoided- easily- if they had done two things:

  1. Had a plan.
  2. Hired some people to advise them about that plan. People that, you know, might have done something like this before.

Rant over.

Research #15

Here’s what I’m reading about (and for the last few weeks):

 

 

Research #14

What I’ve been researching this week:

  • 3D laser scanning
  • New tools for projection mapping
  • Caffeine content of cold-brew coffee
  • M998

Also- I finally made switchel (which I’d mentioned on a previous Research). It’s pretty good. I’d have to say that it’s something I’m likely (with some tweaking, of course) to make again.

 

 

Research #12

Here’s what I’ve been researching this week:

  • Vernier probes and sensor systems for iPads
  • Internet of Things
  • Modification of C-Mount lenses
  • Smartphones used as a biometric sensor
  • Misfit Shine 3d printable mount for watch band
  • Book Creator iPad app
  • Re-soling Troentorp Bastad Clogs (is there really only one place that does this?)
  • Quick pickling
  • UV and ND filters

Misfit Shine

My long-awaited new activity tracker, the Shine by Misfit, came in the mail late yesterday afternoon. I’ve been wearing it since, making it something like 14 hours of total time. Some initial thoughts:

Misfit Shine

 

  1. It’s a beautiful thing
  2. The sports band is nicer and more comfortable than I feared- but I still might look at other options
  3. Easy to set up
  4. Comes with two batteries!
  5. Came with a lovely present from Misfit. Thanks!
  6. Not sure it’s calculating my caloric usage properly- numbers seem pretty high…
  7. I’ve set mine to track my sleeping- but that just seems to show how long I’ve slept for, not the quality of sleep.

Anywho. For 14 hours in, I’m pretty pleased. The thing I’d most like fixed is #7. I’d been using Sleep Tracker on my iPhone to record the duration and quality of my sleep, but I tend to knock it out of bed. I had thought this would be capable of the same thing, but it seems not to be just yet. I can’t think of a reason it’s not able to- so maybe a firmware upgrade could add this feature?

Research #11

What I’ve been researching this week:

  • Good pre-school iPad apps
  • Alternative pickling methods
  • Creating a custom trunk floor for my car
  • Emerging market boutique camera lenses
  • Japanese style iced coffee (also, Cory Doctorow’s no-mess method)
  • Home made seltzer rigs (thanks for the idea, Sarah & Jason)
  • Remote-camera options (security and whatnot)
  • Sourcing Century Stands & Grip Hardware

 

Research #10

What I’ve been reading about this week:

  • Anamorphic vs standard lenses
  • Davinci Resolve Lite LUT’s
  • WiFi enabled outlets and powerstrips
  • Cutting foam
  • Re-Upholstering Eames Lounge chairs
  • Manfrotto Autopole 2
  • Harris Tweed Plaids
  • Hunting Jackets sewing patters
  • Dog Schidt Optiks FF58 lens
  • Gustin Japanese Oxford in white

 

It’s not a cure for everything, folks…

So this happened. San Jose State killed their much-talked-about MOOC experiment. For some pretty good reasons.

But I don’t really care about that, if I’m honest. I think the wrong bit of it is getting all the attention.

Consider what the university did: They took the large numbers of at-risk freshmen who needed to take some basic and remedial courses, and mandated that they do so in a MOOC. In doing so, they took an ill prepared population and pushed them into a method of teaching that has little (none, really) interaction and personal connection with a human instructor, and has no face time- and requires very good time management skills as well as an ability to work independently. Freshmen. At risk.

See the problem?

I started a MOOC once- Dan Ariely was teaching a free course about Decision Making Psychology on Coursera. It was really good- good subject, excellent instructor, well structured, and free. I made it two weeks.

I’m clearly a decent student to have gathered the education I have- I can focus and time manage and all those other skills. But the complexities of my life pulled me away regardless- and this from a course I liked! What, then, can we possibly expect of at-risk freshmen?